Pennington v. Northern Ohio Pizza Company, Inc.
Tonya Pennington |
Northern Ohio Pizza Company, Inc. |
3:2021cv01997 |
October 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Jack Zouhary |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Joint Settlement Notice filed by Tonya Pennington. (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 9 ORDER. Initial Phone Status held on 11/29/21. Counsel are attempting an early resolution of this case. Counsel have also discovered an arbitration clause in Plaintiff's employment agreement. Counsel shall file a Dismissal, either because of a settlement or a referral to arbitration, by 12/17/21. (15 min) Judge Jack Zouhary on 11/29/21. (S,Na) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Northern Ohio Pizza Company, Inc.. (Rhodes, Forrest) |
Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until December 18, 2021 to answer filed by Defendant Northern Ohio Pizza Company, Inc.. (Rhodes, Forrest) |
Filing 6 Marginal Entry Order granting #5 Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Forrest T. Rhodes for Northern Ohio Pizza Company, Inc. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. Judge Jack Zouhary on 11/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 ACTL Code of Conduct)(D,L) |
Order [non-document] granting #7 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until December 18, 2021 to answer. Northern Ohio Pizza Company, Inc. - Answer now due 12/18/2021. Judge Jack Zouhary on 11/17/2021.(D,L) |
NOTICE [non-document] of Initial Phone Status set for 11/29/21 at 2:00 PM (EST) before Judge Jack Zouhary. This Court will initiate the call. No dispositive motions shall be filed prior to the Initial Phone Status. (S,Na) |
Notice by Clerk that Northern Ohio Pizza Company, Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (O,K) |
Filing 5 Motion for attorney Forrest T. Rhodes Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 34660012761, filed by Defendant Northern Ohio Pizza Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice)(K,AR) |
Filing 4 Return of Service by personal service executed upon Northern Ohio Pizza Company, Inc. on 10/28/2021, filed on behalf of Tonya Pennington (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 3 Civil Case Management Procedures Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 10/21/2021. (H,JL) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Northern Ohio Pizza Company, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (H,JL) |
Filing 1 Complaint Original Complaint--Collective Action against Tonya Pennington. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11095683.. Filed by Tonya Pennington. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit Consent to Join - Tonya Pennington) (Sanford, Joshua) |
Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (H,JL) |
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (H,JL) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (H,JL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pennington v. Northern Ohio Pizza Company, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tonya Pennington | |
Represented By: | Joshua Sanford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Northern Ohio Pizza Company, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Forrest T. Rhodes, Jr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.