Computer Programming Unlimited Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Computer Programming Unlimited Inc.
Defendant: Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2021cv02350
Filed: December 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jack Zouhary
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 635
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER. Initial Phone Status held held on 1/7/2022. After discussion, it was agreed that counsel would conduct settlement discussions in an attempt to resolve this case early on. Counsel shall complete Rule 26(a) disclosures and file a brief Joint Status Report by Friday, February 25, 2022. In the interim all legal filings are stayed. Judge Jack Zouhary on 1/7/2022. (15 mins)(D,L)
January 6, 2022 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Computer Programming Unlimited Inc.. (Macek, Katherine)
January 5, 2022 IMPORTANT: NOTICE [non-document]. The Initial Phone Status set for 1/7/22 will now be held at 9:15 AM (NOT 11:30 AM). At that time, counsel shall call the District Court conference line. (D,L)
December 27, 2021 NOTICE [non-document] of Initial Phone Status set for 1/7/22 at 11:30 AM before Judge Jack Zouhary. At that time, counsel shall call the District Court conference line. No dispositive motions shall be filed prior to the Initial Phone Status. (S,Na)
December 21, 2021 Filing 4 Defendant Hartford Casualty Insurance Company's Answer to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Hartford Casualty Insurance Company. (Lloyd, Katheryn)
December 16, 2021 Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (H,JL)
December 16, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. for Hartford Casualty Insurance Company filed by Hartford Casualty Insurance Company. (Lloyd, Katheryn)
December 16, 2021 Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Lucas County, Ohio Court of Common Pleas, case number G-4801-CI-0202103413-000 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 402, receipt number AOHNDC-11183078.. Filed by Hartford Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint and Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lloyd, Katheryn)
December 16, 2021 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (H,JL)
December 16, 2021 Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (H,JL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Computer Programming Unlimited Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Computer Programming Unlimited Inc.
Represented By: David A. Bryan
Represented By: Katherine Anne Pawlak Macek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Represented By: Tadd L. Minton
Represented By: Katheryn M. Lloyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?