Balderas v. Schutz Container Systems, Inc.
| Eli Balderas |
| Schutz Container Systems, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv02427 |
| December 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Notice of Filing Consent to Join filed by Eli Balderas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join Form)(Bryant, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Filing Consent to Join Forms filed by Eli Balderas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent Forms)(Bryant, Daniel) |
Filing 8
ORDER. Teleconference held on February 15, 2022. Counsel shall file a brief Joint Status Report by Friday, April 15, 2022. In the interim, all legal filings, including Defendant's Answer, are stayed until further Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 2/15/2022. (15 mins) (V,S)
|
| Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by Carl E. Habekost filed by on behalf of Schutz Container Systems, Inc. (Habekost, Carl) |
| Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by Roman Arce filed by on behalf of Schutz Container Systems, Inc.. (Arce, Roman) |
| IMPORTANT: NOTICE [non-document] of Initial Teleconference set for Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 9:00 AM before Judge Jack Zouhary. At that time, counsel shall call the District Court conference line. No dispositive motions shall be filed prior to the Initial Teleconference. (V,S) |
| Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Kelsie N. Hendren filed by on behalf of Eli Balderas. (Hendren, Kelsie) |
| Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Eli Balderas. Schutz Container Systems, Inc. waiver sent on 12/29/2021, answer due 2/28/2022 filed on behalf of Eli Balderas (Bryant, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 Civil Case Management Procedures Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 12/30/2021. (R,EM) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons received. No summons issued. (R,EM) |
| Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (R,EM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (R,EM) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (R,EM) |
| Filing 1 Collective and Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Ohio Law with jury demand against Schutz Container Systems, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11200724. Filed by Eli Balderas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Be Named Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bryant, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
