Jackson v. Bergman et al
| Clint E. Jackson |
| Thomas Bergman, Kevin Gladden, John Lewis, Zach McPherson, Jacob Diebert, Issac St. Marie, Brent Huston, April Huston, Matthew E. Herrig and Cody A. Garcia |
| 3:2022cv00081 |
| January 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James G Carr |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice [non-document] of Initial Status/Scheduling Conference set for 3/21/2022 at 10:00 AM to be held by video conference (Toledo) before Judge James G. Carr. Video conference access information to be provided to all participants three (3) days in advance of hearing. (SG,D) |
| Filing 8 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Thomas Bergman, Jacob Diebert, Cody A. Garcia, Kevin Gladden, Matthew E. Herrig, April Huston, Brent Huston, John Lewis, Zach McPherson, Issac St. Marie. (Lute, Melvin) |
| Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by Brittany A. Bowland filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Bowland, Brittany) |
| Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by Melvin L. Lute, Jr filed by on behalf of Thomas Bergman, Jacob Diebert, Cody A. Garcia, Kevin Gladden, Matthew E. Herrig, April Huston, Brent Huston, John Lewis, Zach McPherson, Issac St. Marie. (Lute, Melvin) |
| Filing 5 Original Summons issued to counsel for service upon Thomas Bergman, Jacob Diebert, Cody A. Garcia, Kevin Gladden, Matthew E. Herrig, April Huston, Brent Huston, John Lewis, Zach McPherson, Issac St. Marie. (K,AR) |
| Filing 4 Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons For All Defendants filed by Clint E. Jackson. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Summons - Def A. Huston, #2 Summons - Def B. Huston, #3 Summons C. Garcia, #4 Summons Issac St. Marie, #5 Summons J. Diebert, #6 Summons J. Lewis, #7 Summons K. Gladden, #8 Summons M. Herrig, #9 Summons T. Bergman, #10 Summons Z. McPherson)(Miller, Wesley) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons were not attached and were not issued. (S,DM) |
| Filing 2 Supplement to Complaint, - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Clint E. Jackson. Related document(s) #1 . (Miller, Wesley) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Thomas Bergman, Jacob Diebert, Kevin Gladden, Matthew E. Herrig, April Huston, Brent Huston, Clint E. Jackson, John Lewis, Issac St. Marie, Zach Mcpherson. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11223343. Filed by Clint Jackson. (Miller, Wesley) |
| Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (S,DM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (S,DM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
