Crawford v. M & M Heating & Cooling,LLC
| Cheri Crawford |
| M & M Heating & Cooling,LLC |
| 3:2022cv00245 |
| February 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Labor: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Original Summons issued for service upon M & M Heating & Cooling, LLC. (H,JL) |
| Filing 5 Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons filed by Cheri Crawford. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Landry, Francis) |
| Filing 4 Civil Case Management Procedures Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 2/16/2022. (S,DM) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (S,DM) |
| Filing 3 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons filed by Cheri Crawford. (Landry, Francis) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons were not attached and were not issued. (S,DM) |
| Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (S,DM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against M & M Heating & Cooling,LLC. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11267802.. Filed by Cheri Crawford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Copy of EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit B-Copy of Right to Sue issues by Ohio Civil Rights Commission as to Ohio statutory claim of age discrimination, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Landry, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crawford v. M & M Heating & Cooling,LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cheri Crawford | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Anne Pawlak Macek |
| Represented By: | Francis J. Landry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: M & M Heating & Cooling,LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
