Caruso v. Ke Jia Zhen Enterprises, L.L.C.
| Jill Caruso |
| KE JIA ZHEN Enterprises, L.L.C. |
| 3:2022cv00278 |
| February 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12131 Americans with Disabilities |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Answer to #1 Complaint filed by Ke Jia Zhen Enterprises, L.L.C.. (Urtz, Kevin) |
Order [non-document] granting the defendant's motion for an extension of time until 4/22/2022 to respond to the complaint. (Related Doc #4 ). Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 4/5/2022.(S,AL)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for leave to Plead filed by Defendant Ke Jia Zhen Enterprises, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Leave to Plead)(Urtz, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 Attorney Appearance of Kevin C. Urtz and Brandon M. Rehkopf filed by on behalf of Ke Jia Zhen Enterprises, L.L.C. (Urtz, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Ke Jia Zhen Enterprises, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,DM) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (S,DM) |
| Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (S,DM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for damages and equitable relief against Ke Jia Zhen Enterprises, L.L.C. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11280195. Filed by Jill Caruso. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Dunn, Owen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Caruso v. Ke Jia Zhen Enterprises, L.L.C. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jill Caruso | |
| Represented By: | Owen B. Dunn, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Valerie J. Fatica |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: KE JIA ZHEN Enterprises, L.L.C. | |
| Represented By: | Brandon M. Rehkopf |
| Represented By: | Kevin C. Urtz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
