Kierczak v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Gregory Louis Kierczak
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2022cv00320
Filed: February 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James R Knepp
Referring Judge: Thomas M Parker
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2022 Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ)
February 28, 2022 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Please note: counsel for the parties are under an obligation to meet and confer prior to the filing of plaintiff's reply brief; see the attached order for specific details. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 2/28/2022. (D,JJ)
February 28, 2022 Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (S,DM)
February 28, 2022 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge James R. Knepp II on 02/28/2022. (S,DM)
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]: Plaintiff Gregory Kierczak's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 2/28/2022. (D,JJ)
February 28, 2022 Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (S,DM)
February 28, 2022 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (S,DM)
February 28, 2022 Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (S,DM)
February 25, 2022 Filing 3 Supplement - Certificate of Service, filed by Gregory Louis Kierczak. (Friedes, David)
February 25, 2022 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Gregory Louis Kierczak. (Friedes, David)
February 25, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Gregory Louis Kierczak. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Cause of action, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 USM-285, #7 USM-285, #8 USM-285) (Friedes, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kierczak v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Louis Kierczak
Represented By: David E. Friedes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Cara Staley Rafferty
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?