Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Raymond Moore and Raymond L. Moore |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 3:2022cv00446 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Carmen E Henderson |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Order Counsel for the parties are hereby ORDERED to meet and confer. The conference must be done by in-person meeting or by telephonic or video conference no later than the deadline for filing defendant's brief. Attorneys are cautioned not to rely on the docket entry only. Read the attached Order for additional information and requirements. Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson on 5/2/2022. (W,K)
|
|
Filing 9
Transcript of Proceedings before the Social Security Administration filed by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Related document(s) #1 . (Johnson, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 8
Magistrate Consent Package issued. (W,K)
|
|
Filing 7
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Defendant's Answer, the transcript of the administrative record and the parties' briefs shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 16.3.1, including but not limited to the schedule set forth in that Rule. Any requests for an extension of time shall be filed at least five days prior to the due date for filing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson on 4/7/2022. (W,K)
|
|
Filing 6
Order granting plaintiff's #2 and #5 Motions to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson on 4/7/2022. (W,K)
|
|
Filing 5
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Raymond L. Moore. (Yocum, Mindy)
|
|
Filing 4
Order regarding #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is ordered to file a new IFP application within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Please see order for complete details. Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson on 3/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit) (W,K)
|
|
Filing 3
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 3/22/22. (K,AR)
|
|
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/22/22. (K,AR)
|
|
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (K,AR)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (K,AR)
|
|
Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (K,AR)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Raymond Moore. Related document(s) #1 . (Yocum, Mindy)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Raymond Moore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Yocum, Mindy)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
