Pavarthi, LLC et al v. City of Toledo, Ohio et al
| Pavarthi, LLC, Benjamin Randall and Grenwick Property Holdings, LLC |
| City of Toledo, Ohio, Dennis Kennedy and Cristy Cordell |
| 3:2022cv00461 |
| March 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James R Knepp |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order: Case Management Conference to be held via telephone on 6/27/2022 at 10:30 AM before Judge James R. Knepp II. The conference will convene on the Court's bridge line with dial-in access information to be provided to parties in advance of the call. Judge James R. Knepp II on 5/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting) (B,JL) |
| Filing 9 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by City of Toledo, Ohio, Cristy Cordell, Dennis Kennedy. (Charles, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 8 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Pavarthi, LLC. Cristy Cordell waiver sent on 3/28/2022, answer due 5/27/2022 filed on behalf of Pavarthi, LLC (Randall, Benjamin) |
| Filing 7 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Pavarthi, LLC, Benjamin Randall. Dennis Kennedy waiver sent on 3/28/2022, answer due 5/27/2022 filed on behalf of Pavarthi, LLC; Benjamin Randall (Randall, Benjamin) |
| Filing 6 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Pavarthi, LLC. City of Toledo, Ohio waiver sent on 3/28/2022, answer due 5/27/2022 filed on behalf of Pavarthi, LLC (Randall, Benjamin) |
| Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by John T. Madigan filed by on behalf of City of Toledo, Ohio, Cristy Cordell, Dennis Kennedy. (Madigan, John) |
| Filing 4 Original Summons issued to counsel for service upon City of Toledo, Ohio, Cristy Cordell, Dennis Kennedy. (K,AR) |
| Filing 3 Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Summons Defendant Cordell, #2 Summons Defendant Kennedy, #3 Summons Defendant City of Toledo)(Randall, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons were issued none were provided. (K,AR) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number BOHNDC-11335336.. Filed by Benjamin Randall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Relevant City Code Sections, #3 Exhibit Ohio Attorney General Opinion 2003-04, #4 Exhibit City code section defining junk vehicles) (Randall, Benjamin) |
| Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (K,AR) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (K,AR) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (K,AR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
