McGuire v. Leonard
| Erika McGuire |
| Michael Leonard |
| 3:2022cv00522 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James R Knepp |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order: Case Management Conference to be held via telephone on 6/2/2022 at 10:30 AM before Judge James R. Knepp II. The conference will convene on the Court's bridge line with dial-in access information to be provided to parties in advance of the call. Judge James R. Knepp II on 4/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting) (B,JL) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Service of Leonard's First Set of Interrogatories and First Request for Production of Documents filed by Michael Leonard. (Seitzinger, Mark) |
| Filing 3 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Michael Leonard. (Seitzinger, Mark) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Michael Leonard. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (H,JL) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Michael Leonard. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11352948. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 3:22-cv-485. Filed by Erika McGuire. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for Michael Leonard) (Bruno, Michael) |
| Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (H,JL) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (H,JL) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (H,JL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McGuire v. Leonard | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Erika McGuire | |
| Represented By: | Andrea R. Young |
| Represented By: | Charles E. Boyk |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Bruno |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael Leonard | |
| Represented By: | Mark P. Seitzinger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
