Johnson v. Teijin Automotive Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ronald Johnson
Defendant: Teijin Automotive Technologies, Inc. and Continental Structural Plastics
Case Number: 3:2022cv00632
Filed: April 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James R Knepp
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2022 Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Ronald Johnson. Teijin Automotive Technologies, Inc. waiver sent on 4/22/2022, answer due 6/21/2022 filed on behalf of Ronald Johnson (Landry, Francis)
April 22, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons filed by Ronald Johnson. (Landry, Francis)
April 20, 2022 Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons not provided and were not issued. (S,DM)
April 20, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Teijin Automotive Technologies, Inc. fka Continental Structural Plastics. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11380658.. Filed by Ronald Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Copy of Right to Sue issued by Ohio Civil Rights Commission, #2 Exhibit B-copy of OCRC/EEOC Charge, #3 Exhibit c-Copy of EEOC Right to Sue, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Landry, Francis)
April 20, 2022 Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (S,DM)
April 20, 2022 Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (S,DM)
April 20, 2022 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Teijin Automotive Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Teijin Automotive Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Continental Structural Plastics
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Johnson
Represented By: Katherine Anne Pawlak Macek
Represented By: Francis J. Landry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?