Frederick et al v. CCH Healthcare OH, LLC
Plaintiff: Rick Frederick and CCH Healthcare Limited Liability Company
Defendant: CCH Healthcare OH, LLC
Case Number: 3:2022cv00699
Filed: April 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jack Zouhary
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2022 Filing 11 Joint Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by Rick Frederick. (Gedling, Adam)
June 24, 2022 Filing 10 First Amended complaint against CCH Healthcare OH, LLC. Filed by Rick Frederick. (Gedling, Adam)
June 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER. Telephone Conference held on 6/22/2022. Counsel shall complete the Report of the Parties' Planning Meeting, filling in only what is needed at this juncture -- including proposed deadlines for filing an Amended Complaint, Answer, and briefing on Conditional Certification -- as well as initial discovery deadlines, and standard track with a trial month in 2023. Counsel shall file their Report on the docket by June 30, 2022 for this Court's review and approval. Judge Jack Zouhary on 6/23/2022. (20 mins) (V,S)
June 2, 2022 Notice [non-document] of Initial Telephone Conference set for June 22, 2022 at 9:00 AM before Judge Jack Zouhary. At that time, counsel shall call the District Court conference line. No dispositive motions shall be filed prior to the Initial Telephone Conference. (V,S)
May 31, 2022 Filing 8 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Rick Frederick. CCH Healthcare Limited Liability Company waiver sent on 4/29/2022, answer due 6/28/2022; CCH Healthcare OH, LLC waiver sent on 4/29/2022, answer due 6/28/2022 filed on behalf of Rick Frederick (Gedling, Adam)
May 26, 2022 Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by Kristina Leach filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Leach, Kristina)
May 26, 2022 Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by Scott E. Salsbury filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Salsbury, Scott)
May 19, 2022 Filing 5 Notice of Filing Consent Form to Join Collective Action Under 29 U.S.C. 216(b) filed by Rick Frederick. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Consent Form)(Gedling, Adam)
May 4, 2022 Filing 4 Civil Case Management Procedures Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 5/4/2022. (S,DM)
May 4, 2022 Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (S,DM)
May 2, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of Filing Consent Form to Join Collective Action Under 29 U.S.C. 216(b) filed by Rick Frederick. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Consent Form)(Gedling, Adam)
May 2, 2022 Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons were not attached and were not issued. (S,DM)
May 2, 2022 Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (S,DM)
May 2, 2022 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM)
April 29, 2022 Filing 1 Collective and Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Ohio Law with jury demand against CCH Healthcare Limited Liability Company, CCH Healthcare OH, LLC. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11398462.. Filed by Rick Frederick. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join, #2 Exhibit B - Opt-In Plaintiff Consent, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Coffman, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frederick et al v. CCH Healthcare OH, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rick Frederick
Represented By: Matthew J.P. Coffman
Represented By: Adam C. Gedling
Represented By: Kelsie N. Hendren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CCH Healthcare Limited Liability Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CCH Healthcare OH, LLC
Represented By: Kristina Leach
Represented By: Scott E. Salsbury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?