Houser v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
| Kim Houser |
| Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv00792 |
| May 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James G Carr |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO 28) by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. In re: MDL 2973 Elmiron (Pentosan Polysulfate Sodium) Products Liability Litigation. Case transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned to the Honorable Brian R. Martinotti. (P,R) |
| Case transferred from Ohio Northern has been opened in District of New Jersey [LIVE] as case 2:22-cv-03344, filed 06/01/2022. Related document(s) #4 . (M,TL) |
| Filing 3 Return of Service by via email executed upon Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on 5/16/2022, filed on behalf of Kim Houser (Bailey, Melanie) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (R,EM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (R,EM) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (R,EM) |
| Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (R,EM) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11421755. Filed by Kim Houser. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Borgess, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Houser v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kim Houser | |
| Represented By: | Pamela A. Borgess |
| Represented By: | David C. Harman |
| Represented By: | Melanie S. Bailey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
