Urbina v. Hildebrand
Hyme J. Urbina |
Warden Jenny Hildebrand |
3:2022cv00853 |
May 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Pamela A Barker |
William H Baughman |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Order [non-document] granting Respondent's #5 Motion for extension of time until August 29, 2022 to answer Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Jenny Hildebrand answer due 8/29/2022. Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 07/14/22.(M,MT) |
Filing 5 Motion for extension of time until August 29, 2022 to answer Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with memorandum filed by Respondent Jenny Hildebrand. (Reese, Mary) |
Filing 4 Order to Show Cause (Related Doc. #1 ) The Attorney General has 23 days from the date of this order to file an answer/return of writ. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 04/04/22. (Issued by ordinary mail to Respondent, with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus and via email to Brian Higgins, Office of Ohio Attorney General, on 06/07/22). Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 06/07/22. (M,MT) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 6/7/2022. (P,K) |
Filing 3 Supplement to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), Civil Cover Sheet filed by Hyme J. Urbina. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(R,EM) |
Filing 2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (S,DM) |
Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee paid. 5.00. Receipt # 34660013085. Filed by Hyme J. Urbina. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A and B - Covid 19 Protocols for APA Staff, #2 Envelope) (S,DM) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/23/2022: #3 File Stamped 2254 Petition) (S,DM). |
Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a)., Copy of #2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), and blank Civil Cover Sheet mailed to Hyme J. Urbina, 519-559 at London Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 69, London, OH 43140 on 05/23/2022. Related document(s) #2 , #1 . (S,DM) |
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (S,DM) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (S,DM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Urbina v. Hildebrand | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Hyme J. Urbina | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Jenny Hildebrand | |
Represented By: | Mary Anne Reese |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.