All Quality, LLC v. KZF Design, Inc.
| All Quality, LLC |
| KZF Design, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv00855 |
| May 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Stipulation & Order. The parties stipulate that the Complaint filed in 22 CV 855 will be treated as a Third-Party Complaint in 21 CV 2432. All Quality shall be listed in 21 CV 2432 as Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. KZF Design, LLC shall be listed in 21 CV 2432 as a Third-Party Defendant. All future filings shall be filed in 21 CV 2432. All Quality v. KZF Design, LLC, 22 CV 855 is dismissed without prejudice and closed. Judge Jack Zouhary on 7/28/2022. Associated Cases: 3:21-cv-02432-JZ, 3:22-cv-00855-JZ(D,L) |
ORDER [non-document]. Telephone Conference set for Friday, July 22, 2022 at 10:30 AM. At that time, counsel shall call the District Court conference line provided by email. Judge Jack Zouhary on 7/20/2022. (V,S)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER. Initial Telephone Conference held on July 6, 2022. With agreement by both parties, this case is consolidated with the Case No. 3:21 CV 2432, Granger Construction Co. v. All Quality, LLC, et al. All future filings shall be filed in the companion case (Case No. 3:21 CV 2432). Defense counsel shall review the docket in the companion case to determine whether that CMC Order (Doc. 15 ) is acceptable. If not, counsel may include a Proposed Revised Case Schedule in the Joint Status Report due October 10, 2022. See Order for further details. Judge Jack Zouhary on 7/7/2022. (20 mins) Associated Cases: 3:22-cv-00855-JZ, 3:21-cv-02432-JZ (V,S)
|
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by KZF Design, Inc.. (Shadley, Frederic) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Compliance filed by KZF Design, Inc.. (Snyder, Jason) |
| Notice to Attorney Jason A. Snyder. The Court finds no record of your being admitted to practice in the Northern District of Ohio. Pursuant to LR 83.5, an Application for Admission to Practice or a Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in this case must be filed within 10 business days. The local rules and the attorney admission application are available on the court's web site at: www.ohnd.uscourts.gov. If you are not the attorney of record in this case, a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney pursuant to LR 83.9 must be filed within 10 business days. (W,Jo) |
| NOTICE [non-document] of Initial Telephone Conference set for July 6, 2022 at 9:30 AM before Judge Jack Zouhary. At that time, counsel shall call the District Court conference line provided by email. No dispositive motions shall be filed prior to the Initial Telephone Conference. (V,S) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance by Frederic X. Shadley filed by on behalf of KZF Design, Inc. (Shadley, Frederic) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until July 5, 2022 to answer filed by Defendant KZF Design, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shadley, Frederic) |
|
ORDER [non-document] granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's Answer now due July 5, 2022. Judge Jack Zouhary on 6/14/2022. (V,S)
|
| Filing 5 Return of Service by personal service executed upon KZF Design, Inc. on 5/25/2022, filed on behalf of All Quality, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proof of Service for KZF Design, Inc.)(Remington, Royce) |
| Filing 4 Civil Case Management Procedures Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 5/25/22. (R,EM) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (R,EM) |
| Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon KZF Design, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (R,EM) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by All Quality, LLC. (Remington, Royce) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against KZF Design, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11434586. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 3:21-cv-02432. Filed by All Quality, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit A - KZF Agreement, #4 Exhibit B - KZF Contract Documents, #5 Exhibit C - Subcontract, #6 Exhibit D - General Conditions, #7 Exhibit E - KZF Letter) (Remington, Royce) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (R,EM) |
| Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (R,EM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
