Poll v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Mary Poll
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2022cv00890
Filed: May 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James G Carr
Referring Judge: Darrell A Clay
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2022 Filing 8 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until August 31, 2022 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Johnson, Lisa)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Order granting Defendant's #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint. Commissioner of Social Security answer due 8/31/2022. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 7/19/2022. (H,JL)
May 31, 2022 Filing 7 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (R,Ke)
May 31, 2022 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 5/31/2022. (R,Ke)
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 5/31/2022.(R,Ke)
May 27, 2022 Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 5/27/2022. (S,DM)
May 27, 2022 Filing 3 Status Report filed by Mary Poll. (Wicklund, Edward)
May 27, 2022 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Mary Poll. (Wicklund, Edward)
May 27, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Mary Poll. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Letter to Clerk, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 USM-285 Form, #8 USM-285 Form, #9 USM-285 Form) (Wicklund, Edward)
May 27, 2022 Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (S,DM)
May 27, 2022 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM)
May 27, 2022 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge James G. Carr on 5/27/2022. (S,DM)
May 27, 2022 Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (S,DM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Poll v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Poll
Represented By: Edward A. Wicklund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Lisa Johnson
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?