Barfield v. Deputy Warden Special Services et al
| Zachary Barfield |
| Deputy Warden Special Services, Mailroom Supervisor, Chaplain Rupert, Sergeant Bennett and Sergeant-Director Norriss |
| 3:2022cv00959 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James R Knepp |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Motion for appointment of counsel (unsigned) filed by Plaintiff Zachary Barfield. (S,DM)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Zachary Barfield. (Attachments: #1 Cashier Statement)(S,DM)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint with jury demand against Bennett, Deputy Warden Special Services, Mailroom Supervisor, Norriss, Chaplain Rupert. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Zachary Barfield. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 USM-285, #4 Envelope) (S,DM)
|
|
Copy of #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint, #3 Motion for appointment of counsel and docket sheet mailed to Zachary Barfield at Toledo Ohio Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 8033, Toledo, Ohio 43608 on 6/6/2022. Related document(s) #2 , #1 , #3 . (S,DM)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM)
|
|
Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (S,DM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
