Doe 1 et al v. Gupta et al
| Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 |
| Manish Gupta, Raj K. Gupta and Shraddha Gupta |
| 3:2022cv01122 |
| June 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order [non-document] granting #9 Defendant Raj K. Gupta's Motion for an Extension of Time until 9/25/22 to file an answer, motion, or other responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 8/17/22.(M,SM)
|
|
Filing 9
Motion for extension of time until 9/25/2022 to answer Complaint filed by Defendant Raj K. Gupta. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support, #2 Proposed Order)(Woodworth, Eddie)
|
|
Filing 8
Attorney Appearance by Eddie D. Woodworth, Jr filed by on behalf of Raj K. Gupta. (Woodworth, Eddie)
|
|
Filing 7
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2. Raj K. Gupta waiver sent on 7/27/2022, answer due 9/26/2022 filed on behalf of Jane Doe 1; Jane Doe 2 (Anjum, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 6
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Shraddha Gupta waiver sent on 6/27/2022, answer due 8/26/2022 filed on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Anjum, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 5
Attorney Appearance of Additional Counsel by Douglas M. Eppler and Mark I. Wallach filed by on behalf of Shraddha Gupta. (Eppler, Douglas)
|
|
Filing 4
Attorney Appearance by Mitchell M. Tallan filed by on behalf of Shraddha Gupta. (Tallan, Mitchell)
|
|
Filing 3
Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons received. No summons issued. (R,EM)
|
|
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case (R,EM)
|
|
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (R,EM)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (R,EM)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed under pseudonym filed by Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2. (Anjum, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint with jury demand against Manish Raj Gupta, Shraddha Gupta, Rajnish Gupta, M.D. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11489021. Filed by Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Anjum, Sarah)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
