United States of America v. Amaya
| United States of America |
| Jesus Amaya |
| 3:2022cv01274 |
| July 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Consent Judgment. Judgment in favor of the Plaintiff against Defendant Jesus Amaya in the amount of $48,013.66, plus interest from the date of the judgment at the post-judgment rate. Judge Jack Zouhary on 7/26/20022. (D,L) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Consent Decree filed by United States of America. (Froliklong, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon Jesus Amaya. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,TL) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Jesus Amaya.. Filing fee exempt. Filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Froliklong, Joseph) |
| Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (M,TL) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (M,TL) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (M,TL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Amaya | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Joseph J. Froliklong |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jesus Amaya | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
