Cook v. DeWine et al
Matthew Cook |
Governor Mike DeWine, Dave Yost, Director Annette Chambers-Smith, Hancock County and City of Findlay |
3:2022cv01292 |
July 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
James G Carr |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Motion for Emergency Preliminary Injunction (Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Ex Parte Emergency Preliminary Injunction) (unsigned) filed by Matthew Cook. (S,DM) Modified text/event on 8/4/2022 (D,TM). |
Filing 3 Affidavit of Matthew Cook's "Sincere" Religious Beliefs filed by Matthew Cook. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice-Article)(S,DM) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Matthew Cook. (S,DM) |
Filing 1 Verified Complaint for RFRA and RLUIPA Relief and Writ of Habeas Corpus against Annette Chambers-Smith, City of Findlay, Mike DeWine, Hancock County, Dave Yost. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be a refiling of terminated case 3:21cv1544. Filed by Matthew Cook. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Notice, #3 Summons, #4 USM-285, #5 Proposed Request Service by Clerk) (S,DM) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM) |
Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (S,DM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.