Smith v. Chipotle Mexican Grille, Inc.
| Casey Smith |
| Chipotle Mexican Grille, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv01361 |
| August 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James R Knepp |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12131 Americans with Disabilities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Judge James R. Knepp II on 8/3/2022. (B,JL)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons filed by Casey Smith. (Landry, Francis) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (K,AR) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Application Form AO239) filed by Plaintiff Casey Smith. (Landry, Francis) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Chipotle Mexican Grille, Inc. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Casey Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-copy of EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit B-copy of Right to Sue issued by EEOC, #3 Exhibit C-Copy of OCRC Right to Sue, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Landry, Francis) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (K,AR) |
| Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (K,AR) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (K,AR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Chipotle Mexican Grille, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Casey Smith | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Anne Pawlak Macek |
| Represented By: | Francis J. Landry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chipotle Mexican Grille, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
