Smallwood v. Navar et al
| Robert L. Smallwood |
| Michael J. Navar, Major J. Sylvester, RN Annissa Floure, MD Steven Dood, Jane Doe and Lucas County |
| 3:2022cv01430 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James G Carr |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Robert L. Smallwood. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Prisoner, #2 Inmate Demand Statement)(H,JL) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Jane Doe, Steven Dood, Annissa Floure, Lucas County, Michael J. Navar, Major J. Sylvester. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Robert L. Smallwood. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Inmate Offense Report, #3 Exhibit B - Medical Department Correspondence, #4 Exhibit C - Inmate Offense Report, #5 Exhibit D - CDC Article, #6 Exhibit E - American Medical Association Encyclopedia, #7 Exhibit F - Merck Manual of Medical Information, #8 Proposed Summons, #9 USM-285, #10 Envelope) (H,JL) |
| Judge James G. Carr assigned to case (H,JL) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (H,JL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
