Cassi v. Center for Applied Management Practices, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brittney Cassi
Defendant: The Center for Applied Management Practices, Inc. and Center for Applied Management Practices, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2022cv01563
Filed: September 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James R Knepp
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2022 Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Brittney Cassi. Center for Applied Management Practices, Inc. waiver sent on 10/6/2022, answer due 12/5/2022 filed on behalf of Brittney Cassi (Landry, Francis)
September 6, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons filed by Brittney Cassi. (Landry, Francis)
September 6, 2022 Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided, none were issued. (K,AR)
September 6, 2022 Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (K,AR)
September 6, 2022 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (K,AR)
September 6, 2022 Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (K,AR)
September 3, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against The Center for Applied Management Practices, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11598820.. Filed by Brittney Cassi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Copy of EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit B-copy of Notice of Right to Sue issued by EEOC, #3 Exhibit C-Copy of Right to Sue issued by Ohio Civil Rights Commission, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Landry, Francis)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cassi v. Center for Applied Management Practices, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittney Cassi
Represented By: Francis J. Landry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Center for Applied Management Practices, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Center for Applied Management Practices, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?