Hannigan v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
| Daniel Hannigan |
| CSX Transportation, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv01994 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James R Knepp |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held via telephone on 1/11/2023 at 2:30 PM before Judge James R. Knepp II. The conference will convene on the Court's bridge line with dial-in access information to be provided to counsel in advance of the call. Judge James R. Knepp II on 12/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting) (B,JL) |
| Filing 5 Answer to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by CSX Transportation, Inc.. (Carnes, James) |
| Filing 4 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon CSX Transportation, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (H,JL) |
| Filing 3 Supplement to Complaint - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Daniel Hannigan. Related document(s) #1 . (Harrington, Robert) |
| Filing 2 FILING ERROR Errata Civil Cover Sheet filed by Daniel Hannigan. Related document(s) #1 . (Harrington, Robert). Second Page missing. Modified on 11/4/2022 (H,JL). |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against CSX Transportation, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11696920.. Filed by Daniel Hannigan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Harrington, Robert) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (H,JL) |
| Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case (H,JL) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (H,JL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hannigan v. CSX Transportation, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Hannigan | |
| Represented By: | Robert E. Harrington, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CSX Transportation, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | James R. Carnes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
