Goens v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Karl R Goens |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2022cv02115 |
| November 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Darrell A Clay |
| James R Knepp |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Transcript of Proceedings before the Social Security Administration filed by Commissioner of Social Security. Related document(s) #1 . (Staley Rafferty, Cara)
|
|
Filing 7
Certification of email to U.S. Attorney with case number and social security number of Plaintiff Pursuant to Court's Order filed by Karl R Goens. (Versical, Bethany)
|
|
Filing 6
Magistrate Consent Package issued. (S,DM)
|
|
Filing 5
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 11/22/2022. (S,DM)
|
|
Filing 4
Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 11/22/2022.(S,DM)
|
|
Filing 3
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 11/22/2022. (H,JL)
|
|
Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case (H,JL)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (H,JL)
|
|
Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (H,JL)
|
|
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge James R. Knepp II on 11/22/2022. (H,JL)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Karl R Goens. Related document(s) #1 . (Versical, Bethany)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Karl R Goens. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Civil Cover Sheet) (Versical, Bethany)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Goens v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Karl R Goens | |
| Represented By: | Bethany G. Versical |
| Represented By: | Bethany Versical |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Cara Staley Rafferty |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
