Heilman v. Pandrol, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Heilman
Defendant: Pandrol, Inc. and Pandrol USA, LP
Case Number: 3:2022cv02132
Filed: November 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James R Knepp
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 First Amended complaint against Pandrol, Inc.. Filed by Daniel Heilman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Copy of OCRC/EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit B-copy of Right to Sue issued by EEOC, #3 Exhibit C-Copy of Right to Sue issued by OCRC) (Landry, Francis)
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons-directed to Defendant Pandrol USA, LP filed by Daniel Heilman. (Landry, Francis)
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons-directed to Defendant Pandrol, Inc. filed by Daniel Heilman. (Landry, Francis)
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 FILING ERROR-Issued on wrong case. Civil Case Management Procedures Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 11/28/2022. (S,Ja) Modified on 11/28/2022 (S,Ja).
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order FILING ERROR-Issued on wrong case. Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (S,Ja) Modified on 11/28/2022 (S,Ja).
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Judge James R. Knepp II on 11/28/2022. (B,JL)
November 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 FILING ERROR. Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,Ja) Modified on 11/25/2022 (S,Ja).
November 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Application Form AO239) filed by Plaintiff Daniel Heilman. (Landry, Francis)
November 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint; Jury demand Endorsed Heron, against All Defendants. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Daniel Heilman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Copy of EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit B-copy of Notice of Right to Sue issued by EEOC, #3 Exhibit C-copy of Right to Sue issued by Ohio Civil Rights Commission, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Landry, Francis) Modified to match docket caption on 11/25/2022 (S,Ja).
November 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,Ja)
November 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (S,Ja)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heilman v. Pandrol, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Heilman
Represented By: Katherine Anne Pawlak Macek
Represented By: Francis J. Landry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pandrol, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pandrol USA, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?