Alsept v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Jennifer Alsept |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 3:2022cv02223 |
| December 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James E Grimes |
| James R Knepp |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until March 8, 2023 to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Asher, Ruchi) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (M,MT) |
Filing 5
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. on 12/13/22. (M,MT)
|
|
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. on 12/13/22.(M,MT)
|
| Filing 4 Certificate of filing filed by Jennifer Alsept. (Bowman, Theodore) |
|
Filing 3
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order by Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 12/8/2022. (S,Ja)
|
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Jennifer Alsept. Related document(s) #1 . (Bowman, Theodore) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Jennifer Alsept. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 USM-285 US Marshall forms) (Bowman, Theodore) |
| Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (S,Ja) |
| Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (S,Ja) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge James R. Knepp II on 12/8/2022. (S,Ja) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. (S,Ja) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Alsept v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jennifer Alsept | |
| Represented By: | Theodore A. Bowman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Ruchi Vikram Asher |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
