Felger v. Metal Ware Corporation
| Pricilla Felger |
| Metal Ware Corporation |
| 3:2023cv00161 |
| January 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James R Knepp |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Metal Ware Corporation's Answer DUE 4/14/2023. Judge James R. Knepp II on 3/14/2023. (B,JL)
|
| Filing 4 Motion for extension of time until April 14, 2023 to move or plead to complaint filed by Defendant Metal Ware Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit , #2 Proposed Order)(Myers, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Metal Ware Corporation on 2/16/2023, filed on behalf Pricilla Felger (K,AR) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Metal Ware Corporation placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7022 2410 0000 1055 1927. (H,JL) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Metal Ware Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,DM) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Metal Ware Corporation. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11811275. Filed by Pricilla Felger. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Metal Ware Corporation). (Heller, Jeffrey) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (S,DM) |
| Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (S,DM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Felger v. Metal Ware Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pricilla Felger | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey M. Heller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Metal Ware Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer L. Myers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
