Collins v. Johns Manville
| Daniel S. Collins |
| Johns Manville |
| 3:2023cv00251 |
| February 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Order of Case Management Conference held on 3/17/2023. Time: 5 minutes. Case is assigned to the standard track. Parties to be Joined and Pleading Amendments due by 4/12/2023. Liability Discovery due by 11/6/2023; Damages Discovery due by 12/6/2023. Plaintiff to submit written settlement demand on or before 6/12/2023; Defendant to respond in writing on or before 6/25/2023. Telephone Conference set for 6/26/2023 at 10:30 AM. Counsel to call bridge line at 877-411-9748, access code 1231873. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/17/2023. (M,SM)
|
| Filing 7 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by All Defendants. (Roth, Meghan) |
| Filing 6 Case Management Conference Scheduling Notice: Case management conference to be held on 3/17/2023 at 02:30 PM before Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick. Counsel to call bridge line at 877-411-9748, access code 1231873. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting)(M,SM) |
| Filing 5 Answer to Complaint (Related Doc #1 ) filed by Johns Manville. (Roth, Meghan) |
|
Filing 4
Order of Recusal. This case is returned to the Clerk for reassignment to another judge. Judge Jack Zouhary on 2/9/2023. (V,S)
|
| Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. Judge Jack Zouhary terminated. (S,DM) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,DM) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. for Johns Manville filed by Johns Manville. (Roth, Meghan) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal and State Court Record from Lucas County Common Pleas Court, case number CI-0202301028 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 402, receipt number AOHNDC-11831474. Filed by Johns Manville. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Roth, Meghan) Modified on 2/9/2023 - notified filer of error with attachments. (L,MI). |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM) |
| Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (S,DM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Collins v. Johns Manville | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel S. Collins | |
| Represented By: | Lafe E. Tolliver |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Johns Manville | |
| Represented By: | Meghan Anderson Roth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
