Coker v. Beer Barrel, Inc.
Plaintiff: Maleah Coker
Defendant: Beer Barrel, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2023cv00470
Filed: March 9, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jack Zouhary
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2023 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Beer Barrel, Inc.. (Smith, J.)
April 4, 2023 Filing 6 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand Endorsed Hereon filed by Beer Barrel, Inc.. (Smith, J.)
March 31, 2023 Filing 5 Notice of Filing Consent to Join Form Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b) filed by Maleah Coker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent Form (Charis Barnes))(Baishnab, Robi)
March 22, 2023 Filing 4 Return of Service by certified mail executed upon Beer Barrel, Inc. on 3/17/2023, filed on behalf of Maleah Coker (Baishnab, Robi)
March 13, 2023 Filing 3 Civil Case Management Procedures Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 3/13/2023. (R,EM)
March 13, 2023 Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (R,EM)
March 9, 2023 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Beer Barrel, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (R,EM)
March 9, 2023 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Beer Barrel, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11880175.. Filed by Maleah Coker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (Baishnab, Robi)
March 9, 2023 Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (R,EM)
March 9, 2023 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (R,EM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coker v. Beer Barrel, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maleah Coker
Represented By: Robi J. Baishnab
Represented By: Shannon M. Draher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beer Barrel, Inc.
Represented By: Dalton J. Smith
Represented By: J. Alan Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?