Cole v. Toledo Refining Company, LLC
Plaintiff: keith cole
Defendant: Toledo Refining Company LLC and Toledo Refining Company, LLC
Case Number: 3:2023cv00769
Filed: April 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James R Knepp
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent PBF Energy, Inc. for Toledo Refining Company, LLC filed by Toledo Refining Company, LLC. (Porter, William)
May 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Reply in support of #4 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim with memorandum in support filed by Toledo Refining Company, LLC. (Porter, William)
May 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Opposition to #4 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim with memorandum in support filed by All Plaintiffs. (Bair, C.)
April 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim with memorandum in support filed by Defendant Toledo Refining Company, LLC. (Porter, William)
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Toledo Refining Company, LLC's Answer DUE 4/27/2023. Judge James R. Knepp II on 4/20/2023. (B,JL)
April 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 4/27/2023 to move or plead filed by Defendant Toledo Refining Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mundy, Kara)
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (R,EM)
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (R,EM)
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (R,EM)
April 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, case number G-4801-CI-0202301827-000 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 402, receipt number AOHNDC-11947373.. Filed by Toledo Refining Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Mundy, Kara)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cole v. Toledo Refining Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: keith cole
Represented By: C. William Bair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toledo Refining Company LLC
Represented By: Kara M. Mundy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toledo Refining Company, LLC
Represented By: William G. Porter, II
Represented By: Kara M. Mundy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?