Roo v. United Collection Bureau, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: James Roo
Defendant: United Collection Bureau, Inc., Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Trans Union, LLC
Case Number: 3:2023cv00903
Filed: May 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J Helmick
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2023 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Transunion, Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for Trans Union, LLC filed by Trans Union, LLC. (Walton, Justin)
June 30, 2023 Filing 8 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until August 2, 2023 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Trans Union, LLC. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Walton, Justin)
June 30, 2023 Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by Justin T. Walton filed by on behalf of Trans Union, LLC. (Walton, Justin)
June 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]granting Defendant TransUnion, LLC's Motion for an Extension of Time until 8/2/2023 to file its responsive pleading. re #8 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 6/30/2023.(M,SM)
June 14, 2023 Filing 6 Settlement Notice as to Experian Information Solutions, INC. and United Collection Bureau, INC. filed by James Roo. (Sanders, Craig)
June 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]: Plaintiff has advised that this case is settled as to Defendants Experian Information Solutions, INC. and United Collection Bureau, INC. Plaintiff shall file a stipulated dismissal entry to this effect on or before 8/4/2023. In light of the anticipated dismissal, the response deadline is stayed as to these Defendants. The response of Defendant Trans Union, LLC remains due by 7/3/2023. re #3 , #6 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 6/14/2023. (M,SM)
June 5, 2023 Filing 5 Return of Service by personal service executed upon Experian Information Solutions, Inc. on 5/30/2023, filed on behalf of James Roo (Sanders, Craig)
May 23, 2023 Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by James Roo. United Collection Bureau, Inc. waiver sent on 5/17/2023, answer due 7/16/2023 filed on behalf of James Roo (Sanders, Craig)
May 12, 2023 Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by James Roo. Trans Union, LLC waiver sent on 5/4/2023, answer due 7/3/2023 filed on behalf of James Roo (Sanders, Craig)
May 2, 2023 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC, United Collection Bureau, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,DM)
May 2, 2023 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC, United Collection Bureau, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11974595. Filed by James Roo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - United Collection Bureau, Inc., #3 Summons - Experian Information Solutions, Inc., #4 Summons - Trans Union, LLC). (Sanders, Craig)
May 2, 2023 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (S,DM)
May 2, 2023 Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (S,DM)
May 2, 2023 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roo v. United Collection Bureau, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Roo
Represented By: Craig B. Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Collection Bureau, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trans Union, LLC
Represented By: Justin T. Walton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?