Yates v. CEO8 Consulting, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Andrew J. Yates
Defendant: CEO8 Consulting, LLC and Christopher Ostrander
Case Number: 3:2023cv00930
Filed: May 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J Helmick
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Andrew J. Yates. CEO8 Consulting, LLC waiver sent on 5/9/2023, answer due 7/8/2023; Christopher Ostrander waiver sent on 5/9/2023, answer due 7/8/2023 filed on behalf of Andrew J. Yates (Kemp, Matthew)
May 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon CEO8 Consulting, LLC, Christopher Ostrander. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (K,AR)
May 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Andrew J. Yates. (Kemp, Matthew)
May 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint against CEO8 Consulting, LLC, Christopher Ostrander, with Exhibit A attached. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11981868. Filed by Andrew J. Yates. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - CEO8 Consulting , #3 Summons - Christopher Ostrander). (Kemp, Matthew) Modified on 5/9/2023 - to notify filer of error with attachments. (L,MI)
May 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (K,AR)
May 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (K,AR)
May 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (K,AR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yates v. CEO8 Consulting, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew J. Yates
Represented By: Joseph Jakubowski
Represented By: Matthew T. Kemp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CEO8 Consulting, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Ostrander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?