Latimer v. Ford Motor Company
John Latimer and John F. Latimer |
Ford Motor Company |
3:2023cv00949 |
May 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
James R Knepp |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Stipulation & Order dismissing case without prejudice. Judge James R. Knepp II on 8/7/2023. (B,JL) |
Filing 13 Stipulated Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) without prejudice filed by John F. Latimer. (DeWitt, Michael) |
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Plaintiff's Response/Opposition to Defendant's #10 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim DUE 7/30/2023. Judge James R. Knepp II on 7/27/2023. (B,JL) |
Filing 12 Motion for extension of time until 07/30/2023 to file response/reply to #10 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by Plaintiff John F. Latimer. Related document(s) #10 . (DeWitt, Michael) |
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's #10 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim DUE 7/25/2023. Judge James R. Knepp II on 7/18/2023. (B,JL) |
Filing 11 Motion for extension of time until 07/25/2023 to file response/reply to #10 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by Plaintiff John F. Latimer. Related document(s) #10 . (DeWitt, Michael) |
Filing 10 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Plaintiff's Disciplinary Record))(Smith, Katherine) |
Filing 9 Motion for attorney Anna Casey to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11994805, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Linville, Ronald) |
Filing 8 Motion for attorney Jesenka Mrdjenovic to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11994794, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Linville, Ronald) |
Filing 7 Motion for attorney Katherine Smith to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11994784, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Linville, Ronald) |
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #7 Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Katherine V.A. Smith for Ford Motor Company. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. Judge James R. Knepp II on 5/15/2023. (B,JL) |
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #9 Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Anna Casey for Ford Motor Company. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. Judge James R. Knepp II on 5/15/2023. (B,JL) |
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #8 Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Jesenka Mrdjenovic for Ford Motor Company. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. Judge James R. Knepp II on 5/15/2023. (B,JL) |
Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 06/15/2023 to answer move or respond to #1 complaint filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Linville, Ronald) |
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Ford Motor Company's Answer DUE 6/15/2023. Judge James R. Knepp II on 5/11/2023. (B,JL) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,DM) |
Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (S,DM) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM) |
Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet filed by Ford Motor Company. Related document(s) #1 .(Linville, Ronald) |
Filing 3 Removal Statement filed by Ford Motor Company. (Linville, Ronald) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Ford Motor Company. (Linville, Ronald) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Allen County Court of Common Pleas, case number CV 2023 0127 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 402, receipt number AOHNDC-11986886.. Filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, Summons, Notice of Right to Sue, Envelope and Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit Form 10-K) (Linville, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.