Chapman v. University of Toledo
| Carolyn Chapman |
| University of Toledo |
| 3:2023cv01022 |
| May 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Reply in support of #8 Motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by University of Toledo. (Piersall, Drew)
|
|
Filing 11
Opposition to #8 Motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Carolyn Chapman. (Abood, Norman)
|
|
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time until 7/1/2023 to File any opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss. Defendant may then file any reply on or before 7/17/2023. re #8 , #9 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 6/5/2023.(M,SM)
|
|
Filing 10
Proposed Order filed by Carolyn Chapman. Related document(s) #9 . (Abood, Norman)
|
|
Filing 9
Motion for extension of time until July 1, 2023 to file response/reply to #8 Motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Plaintiff Carolyn Chapman. Related document(s) #8 . (Abood, Norman)
|
|
Filing 8
Motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant University of Toledo. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Charge of Discrimination)(Piersall, Drew)
|
|
Filing 7
Original Summons issued to counsel for service upon University of Toledo. (K,AR)
|
|
Filing 6
Praecipe filed by Carolyn Chapman. Related document(s) #5 .(Abood, Norman)
|
|
Filing 5
Proposed Summons to the University of Toledo filed by Carolyn Chapman. Related document(s) #1 .(Abood, Norman) Modified on 5/25/2023 (K,AR).
|
|
Filing 4
Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons received. No summons issued. (R,EM)
|
|
Filing 3
Supplement to Complaint, - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Carolyn Chapman. Related document(s) #1 . (Abood, Norman)
|
|
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (R,EM)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (R,EM)
|
|
Filing 2
Supplement to #1 Complaint, Pages 1 and 3 of Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Carolyn Chapman. (Abood, Norman)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint with jury demand. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-12006501. Filed by Carolyn Chapman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Termination Letter, #2 Exhibit Letter of Determination, #3 Exhibit Right to Sue (state), #4 Exhibit Right to Sue (Fed), #5 Exhibit Exec Order 11246) (Abood, Norman)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chapman v. University of Toledo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carolyn Chapman | |
| Represented By: | Norman A Abood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: University of Toledo | |
| Represented By: | Drew C. Piersall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
