Rudy v. Commissioner of Social Security
Emily Rudy |
Commissioner of Social Security |
3:2023cv01101 |
May 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Jeffrey J Helmick |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Order granting the parties' stipulated motion to remand this matter back to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act. re #6 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 7/24/2023. (M,SM) |
Filing 6 Stipulated Motion to remand to Social Security Administration filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Golden, Dennis) |
Filing 5 Transcript of Proceedings before the Social Security Administration filed by Commissioner of Social Security. (Golden, Dennis) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong on 6/1/2023. (L,MI) |
Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 6/1/2023. (R,EM) |
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (R,EM) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (R,EM) |
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong on 6/1/2023. (L,MI) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 6/1/2023. (R,EM) |
Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (R,EM) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Emily Rudy. (Farrell, Clifford) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Emily Rudy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Farrell, Clifford) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rudy v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Emily Rudy | |
Represented By: | Clifford M. Farrell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Dennis A. Golden |
Represented By: | SSA-Office of General Counsel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.