Thiel v. Marshall & Melhorn, LLC
| Kaitlyn Thiel |
| Marshall & Melhorn, LLC |
| 3:2023cv01222 |
| June 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James G Carr |
| James R Knepp |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Return of Service by personal service executed upon Marshall & Melhorn, LLC on 6/29/2023, filed on behalf of Kaitlyn Thiel (Klinger, Gary) |
| Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Jonathan L. Schwartz filed by on behalf of Marshall & Melhorn, LLC. (Schwartz, Jonathan) |
Filing 4
Order of Reassignment. This case is returned to the Clerk for reassignment as related to case, Mark Hendrix v. Marshall & Melhorn, LLC, (3:23cv1181). Case to be reassigned to Judge James R. Knepp, II for all further proceedings. Judge James G. Carr on 6/22/2023. (D,TM)
|
| Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case Judge James G. Carr terminated. (H,JL) |
| Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Marshall & Melhorn, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,DM) |
| Filing 2 Supplement to Complaint - Second page to Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Kaitlyn Thiel. Related document(s) #1 . (Klinger, Gary) |
| Filing 1 Class Action Complaint with jury demand against Marshall & Melhorn, LLC. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-12050614.. Filed by Kaitlyn Thiel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Klinger, Gary) |
| Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (S,DM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (S,DM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thiel v. Marshall & Melhorn, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kaitlyn Thiel | |
| Represented By: | Gary M. Klinger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Marshall & Melhorn, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan L. Schwartz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
