Hoffman v. PPG Industries, Inc.
Jason Hoffman |
PPG Industries, Inc. |
3:2023cv01226 |
June 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Jeffrey J Helmick |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2661 Family Medical Leave Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Notice of Substitution of Counsel of Patricia Brandt in place of Kevin Buryanek filed by Plaintiff Jason Hoffman. (Brandt, Patricia) |
Filing 3 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until August 28, 2023 to answer #1 Plaintiff's Complaint or otherwise plead filed by Defendant PPG Industries, Inc. (FitzGerald, Brian) |
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's Motion for an Extension of Time until 8/28/2023 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint or otherwise plead. re #3 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 7/24/2023.(M,SM) |
Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to PPG Industries, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7019 0700 0001 8423 9784. Related documents #1 , #2 (R,EM) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon PPG Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (K,AR) |
Filing 1 Complaint for damages and reinstatement with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-12051696. Filed by Jason Hoffman. (Attachments: #1 Right to Sue, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons). (Buryanek, Kevin) |
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (K,AR) |
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (K,AR) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (K,AR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hoffman v. PPG Industries, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jason Hoffman | |
Represented By: | Daniel S. Dubow |
Represented By: | Kevin A. Buryanek |
Represented By: | Patricia Brandt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: PPG Industries, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Brian P. FitzGerald |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.