Saalman v. County of Mercer, et al.
| Clarence Joseph Bill Saalman, II |
| County of Mercer and City of Celina, Ohio |
| 3:2023cv01538 |
| August 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Certified mail receipt returned confirming copy of #7 Reply to Mercer's Motion to Dismiss, et al. addressed to United States District Court and delivered on 9/14/2023, also address to counsel for Defendant and delivered on 9/14/2023 filed by Plaintiff Clarence Joseph Bill Saalman, II. (Attachments: #1 Letter identifying documents, #2 Envelope) (R,EM)
|
|
Filing 8
Reply in support of #5 Motion to dismiss Under Fed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1) filed by County of Mercer. (Freudiger, Ramon)
|
|
Filing 7
Opposition (Reply) to #5 Motion to dismiss; Motion for injunctive relief, Motion to amend complaint, Motion for summary judgment, Motion to go beyond filed by Plaintiff Clarence Joseph Bill Saalman, II. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Parallel Case See Page 3, #2 On the Question of Identification, #3 Count One of Alleged Charges Flawed, #4 Answers to 4 counts, #5 Envelope)(S,DM)
|
|
Filing 6
Attorney Appearance by Ramon C. Freudiger filed by on behalf of County of Mercer. (Freudiger, Ramon)
|
|
Filing 5
Motion to dismiss Under Fed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1) filed by Defendant County of Mercer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Arrest Record, #2 Exhibit B - Call Report, #3 Exhibit C - Docket, #4 Exhibit D - Letter to Sheriff)(Freudiger, Ramon)
|
|
Filing 4
Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by City of Celina, Ohio. (Abshier, Brandon)
|
|
Filing 3
Certified mail receipt returned, addressed to City of Celina and delivered on 8/9/2023. re #2 Related document(s) #2 . (H,JL)
|
|
Filing 2
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to Plaintiff at counter for service upon City of Celina, Ohio, County of Mercer. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (K,AR)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint and request for injunction with jury demand against City of Celina, Ohio and County of Mercer. Filing fee paid. 402.00. Receipt # 13868. Filed by Clarence Joseph Bill Saalman, II. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Amended Documents and Notes, #3 Robert Martin v. City of Boise, No 15-35845, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons) (K,AR)
|
|
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (K,AR)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (K,AR)
|
|
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (K,AR)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
