Graves v. Findlay Products Corporation
Tammie Graves |
Findlay Products Corporation |
3:2023cv01657 |
August 25, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Jeffrey J Helmick |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2661 Family Medical Leave Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 Proposed Order for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed by All Defendants. Related document(s) #5 . (Barnes, Mark) |
Filing 5 Motion for extension of time until October 26, 2023 to Move, Plead or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint filed by Defendant Findlay Products Corporation. (Barnes, Mark) |
Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Mark S. Barnes, Carl E. Habekost, and Robert L. Solt, IV filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Barnes, Mark) |
Filing 3 Return of Service by certified mail executed upon Findlay Products Corporation on 9/5/2023, no delivery date on green card, date obtained from U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of Tammie Graves (Robinson, Diana) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Findlay Products Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (H,JL) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Findlay Products Corporation. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-12149649.. Filed by Tammie Graves. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (Robinson, Diana) |
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case (H,JL) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (H,JL) |
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (H,JL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Graves v. Findlay Products Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tammie Graves | |
Represented By: | Kera L. Paoff |
Represented By: | Diana M. Robinson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Findlay Products Corporation | |
Represented By: | Carl E. Habekost |
Represented By: | Mark S. Barnes |
Represented By: | Robert L. Solt, IV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.