Heckman v. Edison Communications LLC et al.
| Jenny Heckman |
| Edison Communications LLC and John Taylor |
| 3:2023cv02176 |
| November 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James G Carr |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice [non-document] of case management conference to be held on 1/23/2024 at 09:30 AM to be held by video conference (Toledo) before Judge James G. Carr. Video conference zoom invite to issue to all participants in advance. Report of Parties Planning Meeting due 1/13/2024. Additionally, if Parties wish to enter into an agreed Protective Order in accordance with Appendix L of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, they shall do so not later than one month after the date of this non-document notice; upon doing so, they shall submit the protective order for endorsement by the undersigned; if agreement has not been reached, notify the undersigned and discovery dispute conference shall be set forthwith to resolve any disagreements. Parties advised to review Judge Carr's Case Management Preferences. Any request due to any conflict to postpone a scheduled status, case management, settlement or other conference with Judge Carr shall be considered only upon timely receipt of a motion to change the date or time of such conference. Such motion shall include the nature of the conflict or other circumstance, when counsel first became aware of such conflict, and nature of such conflict i.e., appearance before another court family (or other circumstance) and if there is a conflicting coordination before the court in which the Judge before whom such engagement exists or has arisen. Counsel shall further notify if such conflict is in a state case, and I expect that every effort will have been made by counsel to be excused from such engagement. If the conflict involves a pending federal case, please provide the same information. Under no circumstance will informal request for a continuance i.e., by email, text or phone, be acceptable except in cases of sudden unforeseeable unavoidable emergency. (D,TM) |
| Filing 6 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Edison Communications LLC, John Taylor. (Hart, James) |
| Filing 5 Motion for extension of time until 12/15/2023 to answer filed by Edison Communications LLC, John Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hart, James) |
Order [non-document] granting #5 Defendants' Motion for extension of time to answer as unopposed. Edison Communications LLC and John Taylor answer due 12/15/2023. So ordered. Judge James G. Carr on 12/1/2023. (D,TM)
|
| Filing 4 Return of Service by certified mail executed upon John Taylor on 11/14/2023, filed on behalf of Jenny Heckman (Lalak, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Return of Service by certified mail executed upon Edison Communications LLC on 11/14/2023, filed on behalf of Jenny Heckman (Lalak, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Edison Communications LLC, John Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,DM) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Edison Communications LLC, John Taylor. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-12265309.. Filed by Jenny Heckman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Heckman Consent to Join, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) (Lalak, Christopher) |
| Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (S,DM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (S,DM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
