City of Toledo v. 3M Company et al.
City of Toledo |
3M Company, E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, The Chemours Company, The Chemours Company FC, LLC, Dupont de Nemours, Inc., Corteva, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP, Chemguard, Inc., Central Sprinkler, LLC, Fire Products GP Holding, LLC, Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Carrier Global Corporation, National Foam, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Arkema, Inc., BASF Corporation, Chemdesign Products, Inc., Dynax Corporation, Clariant Corporation, Chemicals Incorporated, Nation Ford Chemical Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Deepwater Chemicals, Inc., Archroma U.S., Inc., Johnson Controls International plc, Chubb Fire, Ltd., Angus International Safety Group, Ltd., Archroma Management LLC, AGC, Inc., John Doe, Chemours Company and Chemours Company FC, LLC |
3:2023cv02282 |
November 27, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
James R Knepp |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case transferred from Ohio Northern has been opened in District of South Carolina as case 2:23-cv-06798, filed 12/19/2023. Related document(s) #9 . (R,AP) |
Filing 9 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-165) by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. In re: MDL No. 2873 Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation. Case transferred to District of South Carolina and assigned to the Honorable Richard M. Gergel. (M,CE) |
Filing 8 Motion for attorney Heidi Levine to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-12303765, filed by Defendant Arkema, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Certificate of Good Standing))(King, James) |
Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by James A. King filed by on behalf of Arkema, Inc.. (King, James) |
![]() |
Notice to Attorney Damon C. Williams. The Court finds no record of your being admitted to practice in the Northern District of Ohio. Pursuant to LR 83.5, an Application for Admission to Practice or a Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in this case must be filed within 10 business days. The local rules and the attorney admission application are available on the court's web site at: www.ohnd.uscourts.gov. If you are not the attorney of record in this case, a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney pursuant to LR 83.9 must be filed within 10 business days. (W,Jo) |
Notice to Attorney Brandon Taylor. The Court finds no record of your being admitted to practice in the Northern District of Ohio. Pursuant to LR 83.5, an Application for Admission to Practice or a Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in this case must be filed within 10 business days. The local rules and the attorney admission application are available on the court's web site at: www.ohnd.uscourts.gov. If you are not the attorney of record in this case, a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney pursuant to LR 83.9 must be filed within 10 business days. (W,Jo) |
Notice to Attorney Ameena Aluddin. The Court finds no record of your being admitted to practice in the Northern District of Ohio. Pursuant to LR 83.5, an Application for Admission to Practice or a Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in this case must be filed within 10 business days. The local rules and the attorney admission application are available on the court's web site at: www.ohnd.uscourts.gov. If you are not the attorney of record in this case, a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney pursuant to LR 83.9 must be filed within 10 business days. (W,Jo) |
Notice to Attorney Heidi Levine. The Court finds no record of your being admitted to practice in the Northern District of Ohio. Pursuant to LR 83.5, an Application for Admission to Practice or a Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in this case must be filed within 10 business days. The local rules and the attorney admission application are available on the court's web site at: www.ohnd.uscourts.gov. If you are not the attorney of record in this case, a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney pursuant to LR 83.9 must be filed within 10 business days. (W,Jo) |
![]() |
Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 28 days from the date of entry of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's decision on whether to transfer to the Multidistrict Litigation to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rhinehart, Erin) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (K,AR) |
Filing 4 Notice of Removal Papers Filed with the Lucas County Common Pleas Court filed by Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Removal Papers Filed in State Court)(Rhinehart, Erin) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Tyco Fire Products LP. (Rhinehart, Erin) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Chemguard, Inc.. (Rhinehart, Erin) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Lucas County Common Pleas, case number G-4801-CI-0202304095-000 Filing fee paid $ 402, receipt number AOHNDC-12288456. Filed by Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Filing and Docket, #2 Civil Cover Sheet and attachment). (Rhinehart, Erin) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (K,AR) |
Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (K,AR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.