Edwards v. Gehle Transport, Inc. et al.
| Nicholas Edwards |
| Gehle Transport, Inc. and Melissa Gehle |
| 3:2023cv02386 |
| December 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James G Carr |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Return of Service by Clerk unexecuted upon Gehle Transport Inc., c/o Keith Gehle (Registered Agent). Service attempted by certified mail on 1/12/2024 filed on behalf of Nicholas Edwards. (R,EM) |
Order [non-document] granting #4 Unopposed Motion for extension of time to move, plead, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Melissa Gehle answer due 2/19/2024; Gehle Transport, Inc. answer due 2/19/2024. So ordered. Judge James G. Carr on 1/22/2024. (D,TM)
|
| Filing 8 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Gehle Transport, Inc. on 12/29/2023, filed on behalf of Nicholas Edwards (K,AR) |
| Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth L. Bolduc filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Bolduc, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Melissa Gehle. (Hartman, Heidi) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Gehle Transport, Inc.. (Hartman, Heidi) |
| Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until February 19, 2024 to answer plaintiff's complaint with memorandum in support filed by Melissa Gehle, Gehle Transport, Inc.. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hartman, Heidi) |
| Filing 3 Attorney Appearance by Heidi N. Hartman filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Hartman, Heidi) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Gehle Transport, Inc., Receipt #9589 0710 5270 1228 5654 46. Keith Gehle, Registered Agent c/o Gehle Transport, Inc. Receipt #9589 0710 5270 1228 5654 53 and Melissa Gehle Receipt #9589 0710 5270 1228 5654 60 placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. (S,DM) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Gehle Transport, Inc., Gehle Transport Inc., c/o Keith Gehle (Registered Agent), and Melissa Gehle. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (R,EM) |
| Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (R,EM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (R,EM) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (R,EM) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief with jury demand against Melissa Gehle, Gehle Transport, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-12318316. Filed by Nicholas Edwards. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons X3). (Wido, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
