Williams-Diggins v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
| Lindsey Williams-Diggins |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 3:2024cv00040 |
| January 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Order: The Case Management Conference set for 2/29/2024 is vacated. No later than March 29, 2024, Defendant shall file either a motion to compel arbitration or a notice indicating it will not be pursuing such a motion. re #9 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 2/26/2024. (M,SM)
|
| Filing 9 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by Lindsey Williams-Diggins. (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 8 Case Management Conference Scheduling Notice: Case management conference to be held on 2/29/2024 at 09:30 AM before Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick. Counsel to call the court's bridge line at 877-411-9748, access code 1231873. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting)(M,SM) |
| Filing 7 Answer to #1 Complaint, filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Hughes, Kimberlyn) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Central Source LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate VantageScore Solutions LLC, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Hughes, Kimberlyn) |
| Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Kimberlyn Hughes filed by on behalf of Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. wrong case number on document they have 3:23cv40 should be 3:24cv40 (Hughes, Kimberlyn) Modified on 1/29/2024 (K,AR). |
| Filing 4 Return of Service by personal service executed upon Experian Information Solutions, Inc. on 1/12/2024, filed on behalf of Lindsey Williams-Diggins (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 3 Motion for attorney Yitzchak Zelman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-12353172, filed by Plaintiff Lindsey Williams-Diggins. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Yitzchak Zelman, #2 Proposed Order Granting Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Yitzchak Zelman, #3 Certificate of Good Standing)(Hilton, Jonathan) |
|
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Yitzchak Zelman. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #3 ). Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 1/11/2024.(M,SM)
|
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (K,AR) |
| Filing 1 Civil Action Complaint with jury demand against Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-12346162. Filed by Lindsey Williams-Diggins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons). (Hilton, Jonathan) |
| Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (K,AR) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (K,AR) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (K,AR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams-Diggins v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lindsey Williams-Diggins | |
| Represented By: | Yitzchak Zelman |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Hilton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kimberlyn Hughes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
