Bryson et al. v. VeoRide, Inc.
Plaintiff: Christoper Bryson and X.B.
Defendant: VeoRide, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2024cv00134
Filed: January 23, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James R Knepp
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order of Case Dismissal: The Court GRANTS the joint #6 Motion to Compel Arbitration. This matter shall be stayed and administratively closed pending the results of the arbitration. The parties shall advise the Court within 30 days of the arbitration whether this matter may be closed via a terminal dispositive order and, if so, shall provide such a proposed order to the Court. Judge James R. Knepp II on 2/14/2024. (B,JL)
February 14, 2024 Filing 6 Joint Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant VeoRide, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - User Agreement, #2 Proposed Order)(Miller, Kyle)
January 24, 2024 Filing 5 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held via telephone on 2/20/2024 at 12:00 PM before Judge James R. Knepp II. The conference will convene on the Court's bridge line with dial-in access information to be provided to counsel in advance of the call. Judge James R. Knepp II on 1/24/2024. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting) (B,JL)
January 24, 2024 Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (R,EM)
January 24, 2024 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (R,EM)
January 24, 2024 Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (R,EM)
January 23, 2024 Filing 3 Answer to Complaint #1 with Jury Demand filed by VeoRide, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - User Agreement)(Miller, Kyle)
January 23, 2024 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by VeoRide, Inc.. (Miller, Kyle)
January 23, 2024 Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Court of Common Pleas, Lucas County, Ohio, case number G-4801-CI-0202302676-000 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 405, receipt number AOHNDC-12370449. Filed by VeoRide, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Order Extending Answer Deadline, #3 Exhibit C - Partial Dismissal with Prejudice, #4 Civil Cover Sheet). (Miller, Kyle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryson et al. v. VeoRide, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christoper Bryson
Represented By: Anthony J. Richardson, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: X.B.
Represented By: Anthony J. Richardson, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VeoRide, Inc.
Represented By: Kyle R. Miller
Represented By: Sarah V. Geiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?