Premiere Concrete Admixtures LLC v. E5 Incorporated
Plaintiff: Premiere Concrete Admixtures LLC
Defendant: E5 Incorporated
Case Number: 3:2024cv00654
Filed: April 11, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jack Zouhary
Nature of Suit: Patent
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2024 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon E5 Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,DM)
April 11, 2024 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against E5 Incorporated. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-12503979.. Filed by Premiere Concrete Admixtures LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit U.S. Patent 11,279,658, #2 Exhibit U.S. Patent 11,919,823, #3 Exhibit Assignment from SPI to E5 Incorporated, #4 Exhibit Cease and Desist Letter, #5 Exhibit Plaintiff's Request for Ex Parte Reexamination, #6 Exhibit USPTO Order Granting Plaintiff's Request, #7 Exhibit Reexamination Office Action, #8 Exhibit Reexamination Certificate, #9 Exhibit NIRC, #10 Exhibit Social Media Post from March 9, 2017, #11 Exhibit Social Media Post from March 23, 2017, #12 Exhibit '487 Application, #13 Exhibit '767 Application, #14 Exhibit Response in '767 Application, #15 Exhibit Letter to SPI's counsel dated December 12, 2023, #16 Exhibit Documents filed in '214 Application, #17 Exhibit Screenshot from Defendant's website E5 patented products, #18 Exhibit Screenshot from Defendant's LinkedIn patented system, #19 Exhibit Screenshot of Defendant's website, #20 Exhibit Screenshot of Defendant's website with ACI definition, #21 Exhibit Reexamination amendments, #22 Exhibit Social Post from February 28, 2017, #23 Exhibit E5 LFA Advertisement, #24 Exhibit INDOT presentation, #25 Exhibit Archived screenshot of SPI website, #26 Exhibit Testing data, #27 Civil Cover Sheet, #28 Summons, #29 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark, #30 Corporate Disclosure Statement) (Tucker, Joseph)
April 11, 2024 This action has been identified as a Patent Case that is subject to the Local Patent Rules. Link to #Local Patent Rules. (S,DM)
April 11, 2024 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM)
April 11, 2024 Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (S,DM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Premiere Concrete Admixtures LLC v. E5 Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Premiere Concrete Admixtures LLC
Represented By: J. Matthew Buchanan
Represented By: John S. Shaffer
Represented By: Joshua Higgins
Represented By: Matthew J. Sorosiak
Represented By: Joseph W. Tucker
Represented By: James M. Buchanan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E5 Incorporated
Represented By: Jason J. Blake
Represented By: John S. Cipolla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?