Goon v. Leist et al.
| Derrik Lee Goon |
| Adam Widman, Captain Aaron Leist, Deputy Collin Salyers and Deputy Ian Eppink |
| 3:2024cv01837 |
| October 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James R Knepp |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Derrik Lee Goon. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(S,DM) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Ian Eppink, Aaron Leist, Collin Salyers, Adam Widman. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Derrik Lee Goon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (S,DM) |
| Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (S,DM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM) |
| Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Without the Civil Cover Sheet, the Clerk does not know if this case is related to or is a refiling of a pending/terminated case in this Court. Blank civil cover sheet mailed to Derrik Lee Goon at 11360 W. Toussaint-Portage Raod, Oak Harbor, OH 43449. Related document(s) #1 . (S,DM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
