Easley v. Stuff et al.
| D. Easley |
| Jori Anderson-Lee, Kevin Shepard, Major Stuff, Officer Petiniot, Lt. Short, Officer Lackner, Warden Swartz, Lt. Mulinix, Deputy Warden Denmon, Officer Browning and Officer Huff |
| 3:2025cv01413 |
| July 7, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Address Change Notice filed by D. Easley. Document Unsigned. (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet, #2 Envelope)(G,G) |
| Filing 10 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal unexecuted upon Officer Mr. Browning. Service attempted by Fed Ex on 11/7/2025 filed on behalf of D. Easley. Related document(s) #6 . (R,EM) |
Filing 9
Order of Case Dismissal without prejudice. I retain jurisdiction to vacate this Order and reopen the action should Plaintiff notify the Court of his updated contact information and intent to proceed with this action within thirty (30) days of this Order. re #8 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 11/20/2025. (M,SM)
|
| With Judge Helmick's approval, no copy of the November 20, 2025 Order was mailed to Plaintiff's invalid address of record. Related document(s) #9 . (M,SM) |
| Filing 8 Returned Mail addressed to Party D. Easley. Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward. Check of ODRC website does not show in custody. Related document(s) #5 . (S,DM) |
| Filing 7 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by FedEx upon Jori Anderson-Lee on 11/6/2025; Deputy Warden Denmon on 11/6/2025; Lt. Mulinix on 11/6/2025; Lt. Short on 11/6/2025; Major Stuff on 11/6/2025; Officer Browning on 11/6/2025; Officer Huff on 11/6/2025; Officer Lackner on 11/6/2025; Officer Petiniot on 11/6/2025; Kevin Shepard on 11/6/2025; Warden Swartz on 11/6/2025, filed on behalf of D. Easley. Related document(s) #6 . (S,DM) |
| Filing 6 Original Summons, Complaint, and Magistrate Consent Form issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 USM-285, #2 Magistrate Consent Form) (V,S) |
|
Filing 5
Order granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 10/27/2025.(R,Ke)
|
| Copy of #5 Order on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis mailed to D. Easley, #306400, 2001 E. Central Ave., Toledo, OH 43608, Toledo Correctional Institution cashier's office with payment instructions, P.O. Box 80033, Toledo, OH 43608, on 10/27/2025. (R,Ke) |
| Filing 4 Discovery - Production of Documents filed by D. Easley. (R,EM) |
| Filing 3 Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Plaintiff D. Easley. (R,EM) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff D. Easley. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Prisoner, #2 Cashier's Statement)(R,EM) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for violation of civil rights with jury demand against all Defendants. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by D. Easley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Grievances, #3 Suicide Prevention Policy, #4 Settlement Information, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 USM-285, #7 Envelope #8 Affidavits of Plaintiff). (R,EM) Modified text on 7/8/2025 (L,MI). |
| Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (R,EM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (R,EM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
