Gonzalez v. Hacker et al.
| Rafael Gonzalez |
| Provider Ms. Hacker, Ms. Hayse, Medical Supervisor Ms. Campbell and Interested Party, State of Ohio |
| 3:2025cv01764 |
| August 25, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James R Knepp |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Notice of Service Completed filed by Rafael Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proof of Service, #3 Withdrawal Slips, #4 Certified Mail Receipts, #5 Envelope)(G,G)
|
Filing 12
Judgment Entry. For the reasons contained in the accompanying #11 Memorandum Opinion and Order, this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge James R. Knepp II on 11/25/2025. (S,JM)
|
Filing 11
Memorandum Opinion and Order. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A; and FURTHER, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Related document(s) #1 . Judge James R. Knepp II on 11/25/2025. (S,JM)
|
Copies of #11 Memorandum Opinion and Order, and #12 Judgment, mailed to Rafael Gonzalez, A839328, Toledo Correctional Institution, 2001 East Central Avenue, Toledo, OH 43608 on 11/25/2025. (S,JM)
|
Filing 10
Attorney Appearance by Daniel H. Huston filed by on behalf of Interested Party, State of Ohio. (Huston, Daniel)
|
Filing 9
Supplement - Declaration/Supplemental filings to #6 Declaration filed by Rafael Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Bureau of Prisons Health Services Clinical Encounter, #2 MRI Lumbar Spine, #3 medical assessment, #4 Letter for investigation, #5 copy of returned mail envelope, #6 Grievance Appeal, #7 TOCI Kite Requests, #8 hearing test, #9 medication list, #10 Envelope)(S,DM)
|
Filing 8
Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons filed by Rafael Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 USM-285, #3 Envelope)(S,DM)
|
Filing 7
Letter to Court filed by Rafael Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(S,DM)
|
Filing 6
Motion to Amend and Supplement (Declaration) filed by Rafael Gonzalez. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Inmate Requests, #2 Letter to Clerk, #3 envelope)(S,DM)
|
Filing 5
Motion to Supplement Discovery filed by Plaintiff Rafael Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Medical records, #3 Envelope)(R,EM)
|
Filing 4
Motion to amend complaint filed by Plaintiff Rafael Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Medical records, #3 Envelope)(R,EM)
|
Filing 3
Supplement to #1 Complaint, Medical Documents filed by Rafael Gonzalez. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Letter to Clerk, #2 Envelope)(H,JL)
|
Filing 2
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to Plaintiff for service upon Ms. Campbell, Ms. Hacker, Ms. Hayse. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (R,EM)
|
Filing 1
Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights against Ms. Campbell, Ms. Hacker, and Ms. Hayse. Filing fee paid. $405. Receipt # 15205. Filed by Rafael Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Medical Records, #4 Supporting Documents, #5 Envelope (R,EM)
|
Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (R,EM)
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (R,EM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.