Rauner v. Family Health Services, LLC
| Peter M. Rauner |
| Family Health Services, LLC and David Tatro |
| 3:2026cv01034 |
| May 4, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Supplement to Complaint, - Page 2 Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Peter M. Rauner. Related document(s) #1 . (Green, F.) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet Instruction Page filed by Peter M. Rauner. Related document(s) #1 . (Green, F.) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Family Health Services, LLC, David Tatro. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (G,G) |
| Filing 1 Verified Complaint with jury demand endorsed hereon against Family Health Services, LLC and David Tatro. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-13654031. Filed by Peter M Rauner. (Attachments: #1 First Page Only: Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - David Tatro , #3 Summons - Family Health Services, LLC ) (Green, F.) Modified to correct text on 5/4/2026 (G,G). |
| Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (G,G) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (G,G) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.